CO129-402 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [7-8] — Page 277

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

Amony

the Chinese, & in matters political

4 Commercial.

10

explains

that deportation could not

beefall to lesorted to, of people implicated.

Mlads feating my

sesion

to the number

omj

C

that in the present

the Chemiese

upal

a

Ada would havr

effect upon

stat which in certaing disallowance of the

Moram danynom

the posting of

269

articles

4

inciting to boy.ott. to mi para 7

Th

shous

heeded to stop the pattention of

notices inciting

Fat Shan case upred

the dangers to to appretended from "ellaring besetting to be practiced without unfiction. Mt Ord would probabl

Kat sma

have been ineffection.

though

printing of the fort.

a

In case

for

k

13 shows the

Cha

good

yth

results which have

flowed from the Oder.

I certainl

makes out

think that that offension

fécution legislation,

special

lah is

beaker. If

#

the boycott was well-depried

present contane, it does not

intaner, it does not follow that it would

no

th

oumion

every

net

up y

infomibility was accepted (

bi justifid

4 :

Rough the communal

Ord 10

f 1910,

which

Lad brews with much hesitation

ter to willeyes,

thin

A

food

Care

inchirie to risk that

#

the provisions of

mo.

with gard

kin is a

is a greater

thy might

unsatisfactory

the Old a necessarily are,

without serion ill-aspects,

allowed to stand, without serious

A

• far

they whate simply

to the

* ffene

promitment a prevention of "Mycotting (= mireiting to boycott). "Th jo

in protary light

in Kinking that deportation

would not have sufficed to stop the

trouble. Hough he might well have tried

the experiment

pare 5.17.

;

it is fait clear for

that som

for ther

check kan

"that pranded s previous legislation

Way

titolitant kan then

town, fohin arrangements

*

of solidarity anony

Comm. to in

ar

kecemarily

device which can

praction, it is not "propers applies to Hong Kong itself.

log 1910 pravidle for

101

semi.

Ab..

v. judicial

A rate.

practic

K

exquing hiper imposition of

same train, Rough in

At the same

Tak should have to inford, it cannot be suid hat the provision for it

in unprecedented (sc

especially 518 (3) of the Prevention of Crime (Jaland) Act of 1882). I hit t

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.